Interesting thing about the chart that accompanies the article is that it shows that the Woodruff years were actually consistently profitable and had clearly attracted new audiences-- doubling or tripling the turnout from the Brustein years. Not quite the scuttlebutt I had been hearing up until now.
Hi Ian Good point! Yes, that IS interesting. I miss Woodruff's work, personally, I alway felt he produced consistently beautiful and provocative theatre.
Interesting thing about the chart that accompanies the article is that it shows that the Woodruff years were actually consistently profitable and had clearly attracted new audiences-- doubling or tripling the turnout from the Brustein years. Not quite the scuttlebutt I had been hearing up until now.
ReplyDeleteHi Ian
ReplyDeleteGood point! Yes, that IS interesting. I miss Woodruff's work, personally, I alway felt he produced consistently beautiful and provocative theatre.